Tuesday 19 June 2012

Originality will get you nowhere.

Disney released its big money blockbuster John Carter this year and it bombed so badly it has been declared the biggest flop in cinema history with losses of over $200 million.

But was it really that bad? Well, no actually it wasn’t. In fact I thought it was pretty good which is quite sad considering nobody saw it because they figured it must be bad because of the unfortunate box office figures.

The movie is about a man, surprisingly called John Carter, who is a bit of a loner living in the old West. While in an unwanted skirmish between cowboys and Indians Carter ends up in a strange cave with stranger spiderlike markings on the floor and walls. Whilst in the cave he’s attacked by a random cloaked man from a divine cult, but he manages to kill him and ends up warping to the planet Barsoom (Mars) thanks to an old artefact the cloaked man had.

The rest of the movie focuses on how John Carter meets with the several races of Mars in an attempt to return back to Earth which of course results in him taking part in a massive war and deciding he rather prefers it on Mars, and who wouldn’t when Lynn Collins is playing your love interest.

The story admittedly is a bit bizarre, essentially a group of angels (including the random cloaked bloke on Earth) want to cause havoc on Mars by giving a power-hungry human a ridiculously powerful weapon and the only way to stop him is to get John Carter who, thanks to his background and difference in gravity, is a badass and can jump phenomenally far. Up against the power-crazed human is leader of the humans Tardos Mors (CiarĂ¡n Hinds) and his warrior/scientist daughter Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins).

I think John Carter is a pretty good movie, it has a far better story than Avatar does and although it doesn’t have the impressive establishing shots of James Cameron’s cash-cow its visuals generally match it if not better it in places. Everything from the action to the plot, the acting, the sound and the visuals is really good. Okay it isn’t the best film you’ll ever see, but it’s definitely deserving of more credit than it received.

It annoys me a little that people wrote off John Carter simply because it didn’t make much money. The only difference between this and Avatar is the hype. One set box office records and became the highest grossing film of all time; the other set records it would rather not have. It really shows the impact marketing can have on how much money a film can make, not that John Carter didn’t have a strategy, it just didn’t whip up the same bizarre hype Avatar did, and the news about its poor box office sales simply acted as the final nail in its coffin.

John Carter was a bit of a risky film, it’s something different and it even attempted to set a film on the red planet, something that has notoriously had no success whatsoever in movieland. It put story over the razzle-dazzle and I’m really disappointed it didn’t do well because it will only strangle originality in cinema even more.

Final Verdict: 3 Stars. A pretty accomplished movie that deserved a lot better.

No comments:

Post a Comment